The recent impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte has shaken the Philippine political landscape, raising questions about the real motives behind this high-profile political maneuver. While on the surface it appears to be a bitter feud between the Marcos and Duterte factions, could this entire spectacle be a well-orchestrated ploy to erase the Kakampink movement from the national conversation and consolidate power between two dominant political dynasties?
A Manufactured Rivalry?
Since the 2022 elections, the Kakampink movement—led by former Vice President Leni Robredo—has remained a persistent force advocating for good governance, transparency, and accountability. Despite losing the presidency, the movement continues to challenge the entrenched powers of the Marcos and Duterte clans. However, in the lead-up to the crucial 2025 midterm elections, the nation’s political discourse has shifted away from opposition groups and is instead fixated on the supposed infighting between the Marcos and Duterte camps.
What if this so-called feud is nothing more than an elaborate distraction? A way to manipulate public perception, ensuring that Filipinos remain trapped in a binary political system where only two choices exist—Marcos or Duterte. By dominating the headlines with an impeachment scandal, the public is left with little room to engage with alternative political movements. The Kakampinks, who once led massive rallies and social media campaigns, are now being drowned out by a narrative controlled by the same two families that have ruled for decades.
Controlling the Narrative, Controlling the Voter’s Mind
The mechanics of this alleged conspiracy rely on a few key tactics:
Weaponized Political Drama – The Marcos-Duterte conflict, whether real or staged, dominates political discussions, ensuring that opposition groups like the Kakampinks are sidelined and struggle to regain relevance.
Media Saturation – State-aligned and oligarch-controlled media outlets focus solely on the impeachment case, preventing discussions on issues that truly matter to the Filipino people, such as economic struggles, corruption, and human rights abuses.
Political Rebranding – By pitting Marcos and Duterte against each other, both sides get an opportunity to reset their public image. Marcos Jr. can position himself as a stabilizing leader, while Sara Duterte could emerge as a ‘persecuted’ politician, creating a sympathy wave that benefits her future political ambitions.
Controlled Opposition – Without a strong opposition, voters are left with no choice but to support either the Marcos or Duterte camp, ensuring that the cycle of power remains in the hands of these two dynasties.
Historical Erasure – With the constant focus on Marcos and Duterte, the Kakampink movement may eventually be erased from public memory. Political narratives, history books, and public discourse may downplay or completely exclude the role of progressive opposition, further solidifying the monopoly of these two camps.
The Ultimate Goal: A Marcos-Duterte Monopoly
If this theory holds weight, then the endgame is clear—eliminate the Kakampink movement from the political scene and ensure that Filipinos only have two choices: Marcos or Duterte. This artificial dichotomy benefits both camps, as it forces the electorate to choose between two political brands that, in reality, work to preserve each other’s hold on power.
The impeachment could just be the opening act. The real battle will unfold as the 2025 elections approach. If this strategy is successful, the Kakampinks will be reduced to a footnote in Philippine history, with their movement either co-opted, silenced, or entirely erased. Future elections may no longer even acknowledge alternative voices, leaving the nation in a perpetual cycle of political control under the same ruling families.
What Can Be Done?
If Filipinos want to break free from this political cycle, awareness is key. Voters must remain vigilant and recognize the possibility that they are being manipulated. Opposition groups need to reclaim space in the political discourse, counter the controlled narratives, and present a viable alternative that goes beyond the manufactured Marcos-Duterte rivalry.
Additionally, independent media, grassroots organizations, and political analysts must work together to ensure that diverse perspectives are heard. The people must demand transparency, fair electoral processes, and greater representation of alternative voices in government.
The impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte may be making headlines today, but the real question is: Who benefits the most from this spectacle? If the answer excludes the Filipino people, then it’s time to challenge the system and demand a truly democratic political landscape.